You define what matters. Datum researches your full benchmarking framework, connects every finding to its evidence, and keeps the work ready for the next question.
Your expertise sets the direction. The research workflow makes it consistent.
Without a shared research methodology, even strong teams can end up with uneven coverage, scattered evidence and too little visibility into the patterns emerging across benchmarks.
Consultants collect individual examples without building a complete, comparable profile for each benchmark. The detail is there, but the bigger picture—recurring archetypes, common practices and outliers—is difficult to see.
When project leadership adds a question or benchmarking dimension, consultants must reopen annual reports and other sources, reread the relevant sections and manually extract new findings—repeating work on documents already reviewed.
Datum systematically researches consultant-defined primary benchmarks and adds relevant secondary benchmarks to reveal patterns, existing archetypes and potential outliers. Every finding remains connected to its evidence, while gaps are recorded explicitly.
Research can be excellent, but coverage and documentation often depend on individual working styles.
A repeatable research methodology that produces comparable findings and retains the evidence behind them.
You decide the research question and the comparison framework. Datum handles the repeatable work of building and organizing the evidence base.
Select your primary benchmarks and the dimensions you want to compare. The consultant decides what's relevant.
Datum researches each entity and dimension, gathers supporting sources, checks quotes, and records missing information.
Explore comparable summaries or open detailed findings. Add a dimension as the project evolves and extend the research.
The result: a connected project knowledge base, with the framework, benchmark entities, findings, source copies and visible research gaps in one place.
Datum researches consultant-selected primary benchmarks, then complements them with secondary benchmarks to help reveal common practice and potential outliers.
Switch between views to explore the actual product interface.
View defined dimensions and the entities being researched, including secondary benchmarks used to broaden the context.
Screenshot from the existing Datum interface
FRAMEWORK / BENCHMARKSOpen findings alongside their supporting quotes, original links and retained source copies.
Each claim can be inspected rather than accepted on trust
FINDINGS / SOURCESDistinguish not found, unclear and not applicable information, and surface retrieval failures rather than obscuring them.
Known gaps remain visible to the team
GAPS / EXCEPTIONSReview scope, research questions and detailed dimension conclusions in the same project knowledge base.
Depth when you need it, structure when you don't
DIMENSION / DETAILManual research and AI chat can both produce excellent work. The difference is whether a consistent research process is embedded into the workflow—or left to each person to recreate.
Share a benchmarking topic and the entities you want to compare. We'll walk through the framework, detailed findings, supporting sources and how Datum handles new questions.
Opens an email to hello@rkitect.io